On 2/23/16 6:39 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:45:09PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
/* 'SMCA': AMD64 Scalable MCA */
+#define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC0       0xc0002003
  #define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_CONFIG     0xc0002004
  #define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_IPID               0xc0002005
+#define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC1       0xc000200a
+#define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISC(x)     (MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC0 + 0x10*(x))
  #define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_CONFIG(x)  (MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_CONFIG + 0x10*(x))
  #define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_IPID(x)    (MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_IPID + 0x10*(x))
+#define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISCy(x, y) ((MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC1 + y) + 
(0x10*(x)))
Are those MSRs going to be used in multiple files? If not, they should
all go to mce.h.

I think MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC0 would be required in mce.c as well.
So might be better to retain it here.

MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC1 might be required only in mce_amd.c, So, I'll move it to mce.h


+static u32 get_block_address(u32 current_addr,
+                            u32 low,
+                            u32 high,
+                            unsigned int bank,
+                            unsigned int block)
Use arg formatting like the rest of functions in the file please.

Will fix.

+                       u32 smca_low, smca_high;
s/smca_//

Will fix.


+
+                       if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_CONFIG(bank),
+                                      &smca_low, &smca_high) ||
+                           !(smca_low & MCI_CONFIG_MCAX))
+                               goto nextaddr_out;
+
+                       if (!rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISC(bank),
+                                       &smca_low, &smca_high) &&
+                           (smca_low & MASK_BLKPTR_LO))
+                               addr = MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISCy(bank,
+                                                               block - 1);
unnecessary line break.


Will fix it like so-
addr = MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISCy(bank, block - 1);

(It comes up to 81 chars, but will ignore checkpatch in this case..)

Thanks,
-Aravind.

Reply via email to