----- Original Message -----
From: Jesse Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: 1.2.45 Linux Scheduler
> --------- Received message begins Here ---------
>
> >
> > In the Linux scheduler they use a circular queue implementation with
round
> > robin. What is the advantage of this over just using a normal queue with
a
> > back and front. Also does anyone know what a test plan for such a design
> > would even begin to look like. This is a project for a proposal going
around
> > in my neighborhood and I am wondering why in the world someone would
want to
> > modify the Linux scheduler to this extent.
>
> This is not an authoritive answer but:
>
> It's simple, and fast. Locks only needed when adding/removing
> entries.
>
> It is also nearly optimum when the queue only has 5 (or so) number of
> entries. It will not be optimum if there are 32/64 CPUs with 120 or more
> runnable entries. There are other schedulers available that may do a
> better job for that situation.
I don't know who runs Linux w/ 32/64 CPUs and w/ 120 active procs but
if someone on earth exist ... :
http://www.mycio.com/davidel/lk/adapt-sched-v3.0-2.2.14.gz
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
