On 23/02/16 16:13, Georgi Djakov wrote:
+/* msm8916 */ +#define RPM_XO_CLK_SRC 0 +#define RPM_XO_A_CLK_SRC 1 +#define RPM_PCNOC_CLK 2 +#define RPM_PCNOC_A_CLK 3 +#define RPM_SNOC_CLK 4 +#define RPM_SNOC_A_CLK 5 +#define RPM_BIMC_CLK 6 +#define RPM_BIMC_A_CLK 7 +#define RPM_QDSS_CLK 8 +#define RPM_QDSS_A_CLK 9 +#define RPM_BB_CLK1 10 +#define RPM_BB_CLK1_A 11 +#define RPM_BB_CLK2 12 +#define RPM_BB_CLK2_A 13 +#define RPM_RF_CLK1 14 +#define RPM_RF_CLK1_A 15 +#define RPM_RF_CLK2 16 +#define RPM_RF_CLK2_A 17 +#define RPM_BB_CLK1_PIN 18 +#define RPM_BB_CLK1_A_PIN 19 +#define RPM_BB_CLK2_PIN 20 +#define RPM_BB_CLK2_A_PIN 21 +#define RPM_RF_CLK1_PIN 22 +#define RPM_RF_CLK1_A_PIN 23 +#define RPM_RF_CLK2_PIN 24 +#define RPM_RF_CLK2_A_PIN 25 +
These names are more generic, and offsets are specific to the 8916 chip, adding soc prefix to these would make more sense and also set a rule for the next soc support patches too.
Thanks, srini
