On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:57:22AM -0800, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:04:29PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > @@ -2428,10 +2448,11 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct 
> > scan_control *sc,
> >                     reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
> >                     scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
> >  
> > +                   sc->reclaim_idx = reclaim_idx;
> >                     shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
> >                     zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
> 
> The setting of sc->reclaim_idx is unexpected here. Why not set it in
> the caller and eliminate the reclaim_idx parameter?
> 

Initially because it was easier to develop the patch for but it's good
either way. I updated this patch and handled the conflicts. It's now set
in the callers.

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to