Commit-ID:  f05058c4d652b619adfda6c78d8f5b341169c264
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/f05058c4d652b619adfda6c78d8f5b341169c264
Author:     Chris J Arges <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:49:25 -0600
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:35:43 +0100

x86/uaccess: Add stack frame output operand in get_user() inline asm

Numerous 'call without frame pointer save/setup' warnings are introduced
by stacktool because of functions using the get_user() macro. Bad stack
traces could occur due to lack of or misplacement of stack frame setup
code.

This patch forces a stack frame to be created before the inline asm code
if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled by listing the stack pointer as an
output operand for the get_user() inline assembly statement.

Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Marek <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Pedro Alves <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bc85501f221ee512670797c7f110022e64b12c81.1453405861.git.jpoim...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index a4a30e4..9bbb3b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -179,10 +179,11 @@ __typeof__(__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(x) > sizeof(0UL), 
0ULL, 0UL))
 ({                                                                     \
        int __ret_gu;                                                   \
        register __inttype(*(ptr)) __val_gu asm("%"_ASM_DX);            \
+       register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP);                               \
        __chk_user_ptr(ptr);                                            \
        might_fault();                                                  \
-       asm volatile("call __get_user_%P3"                              \
-                    : "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu)                 \
+       asm volatile("call __get_user_%P4"                              \
+                    : "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu), "+r" (__sp)    \
                     : "0" (ptr), "i" (sizeof(*(ptr))));                \
        (x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr))) __val_gu;                    \
        __builtin_expect(__ret_gu, 0);                                  \

Reply via email to