On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:25:13 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> wrote:
> Steven, does this change look reasonable to you? I remember we had a > discussion about this. I'm still very nervous about having tracepoints in the preemptirqsoff section. But that's not relevant to this patch. I'm fine with it. Go ahead and apply it if it doesn't break anything ;-) -- Steve > > * Yang Shi | 2016-02-23 13:23:23 [-0800]: > > >When running -rt kernel with both PREEMPT_OFF_HIST and LOCKDEP enabled, > >the below error is reported: > >
