Hello, On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: >> It can be, but we can print out the ino and userland can match that up >> with path if necessary. > > Wouldn't be cgroup id the better choice?
AFAIK we aren't exposing cgroup id to userland anywhere right now. Eventually, I think the right thing to do is using the same number for both. Thanks. -- tejun
