On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:42:36 +0100
Jannik Becher <becher.jan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue.
>
You should be more specific: which style issue?
See also my comment below.
> Signed-off-by: Jannik Becher <becher.jan...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c
> b/drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c
> index 9e700ca..186ef2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c
> @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ static int hackrf_set_params(struct hackrf_dev *dev)
> unsigned int uitmp, uitmp1, uitmp2;
> const bool rx = test_bit(RX_ON, &dev->flags);
> const bool tx = test_bit(TX_ON, &dev->flags);
> +
> static const struct {
> u32 freq;
> } bandwidth_lut[] = {
If this has been found by scripts/checkpatch.pl as:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#252: FILE: drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c:252:
+ const bool tx = test_bit(TX_ON, &dev->flags);
+ static const struct {
it is a false positive, as the code which follows the blank line is a
declaration too.
Ciao ciao,
Antonio
--
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
