On 02/29, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 29-02-16 18:38:45, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > In this case you do not need put_task_struct(). > > Why not? Both are after get_proc_task which takes a reference to the > task...
Yes, but we already have put_task_struct(task) in the "out_mm" path, so "goto out_mm" should work just fine? Oleg.
