Hi Ingo, On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:01:43 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > u32? > > > > It would have to be __u32, but we already use int and unsigned int > > extensively in the siginfo structure (which are both always assumed to > > be 32 bits). So "unsigned int" probably makes most sense. > > No. This whole mishap is an object lesson in why it's a bad idea to ever use > ABI > types outside of the __[us][8|16|32|64] space: some of them are 'fine', some > of > them (like longs) are not.
Absolutely. I was just trying to be consistent with the rest of the structure. Dave has submitted a follow up version which I have Acked. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
