4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

commit 9ac15b7a8af4cf3337a101498c0ed690d23ade75 upstream.

In the case that the new vector mask is a subset of the existing mask there is
no point to do a AND operation of currentmask & newmask. The result is
newmask. So we can simply copy the new mask to the current mask and be done
with it. Preparatory patch for further consolidation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Joe Lawrence <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
                                       vector_cpumask);
                        d->move_in_progress =
                           cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
-                       cpumask_and(d->domain, d->domain, vector_cpumask);
+                       cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
                        goto success;
                }

Reply via email to