On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 05:26:43PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >Hm, but I guess without the follow-up patches for libata, it will not > >really get tested much. Jeff, if I accept this, what's your feelings of > >letting libata be the "test bed" for it? > > > It would be easiest for me to merge this through my > libata-dev.git#upstream tree. That will auto-propagate it to -mm, and > ensure that both base and libata bits are sent in one batch. > > Just shout if you see NAK-able bits... > > Work for you?
That works for me. The only question I have is on the EXPORT_SYMBOL() stuff for the new driver/base/ functions. Tejun, traditionally the driver core has all exported symbols marked with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). So, any objection to marking the new ones (becides the "mirror" functions) in this manner? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
