4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

commit 5da0c1217f05d2ccc9a8ed6e6e5c23a8a1d24dd6 upstream.

There is no need to allocate a new cpumask for sending the cleanup vector. The
old_domain mask is now protected by the vector_lock, so we can safely remove
the offline cpus from it and send the IPI with the resulting mask.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Joe Lawrence <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |   16 +++-------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -528,21 +528,11 @@ static struct irq_chip lapic_controller
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 static void __send_cleanup_vector(struct apic_chip_data *data)
 {
-       cpumask_var_t cleanup_mask;
-
        raw_spin_lock(&vector_lock);
+       cpumask_and(data->old_domain, data->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
        data->move_in_progress = 0;
-       if (unlikely(!alloc_cpumask_var(&cleanup_mask, GFP_ATOMIC))) {
-               unsigned int i;
-
-               for_each_cpu_and(i, data->old_domain, cpu_online_mask)
-                       apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(i),
-                                           IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR);
-       } else {
-               cpumask_and(cleanup_mask, data->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
-               apic->send_IPI_mask(cleanup_mask, IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR);
-               free_cpumask_var(cleanup_mask);
-       }
+       if (!cpumask_empty(data->old_domain))
+               apic->send_IPI_mask(data->old_domain, IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR);
        raw_spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
 }

Reply via email to