4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>

commit 271dba4521aed0c37c063548f876b49f5cd64b2e upstream.

If we failed to create a hard link we were not always releasing the
the transaction handle we got before, resulting in a memory leak and
preventing any other tasks from being able to commit the current
transaction.
Fix this by always releasing our transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6493,7 +6493,7 @@ out_unlock_inode:
 static int btrfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
                      struct dentry *dentry)
 {
-       struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
+       struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans = NULL;
        struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(dir)->root;
        struct inode *inode = d_inode(old_dentry);
        u64 index;
@@ -6519,6 +6519,7 @@ static int btrfs_link(struct dentry *old
        trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 5);
        if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
                err = PTR_ERR(trans);
+               trans = NULL;
                goto fail;
        }
 
@@ -6552,9 +6553,10 @@ static int btrfs_link(struct dentry *old
                btrfs_log_new_name(trans, inode, NULL, parent);
        }
 
-       btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
        btrfs_balance_delayed_items(root);
 fail:
+       if (trans)
+               btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
        if (drop_inode) {
                inode_dec_link_count(inode);
                iput(inode);

Reply via email to