On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:18:23AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:37:18PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > I come up with something you may not like ;-) , which is taking the > > strings of the expressions, for example: > > Heh, cute. Better than nothing I suppose.
It would be very good to get feedback from people using RCU heavily. Some RCU read-side critical sections access a lot of fields, which might make this sort of notation a bit of a maintainability issue. Thanx, Paul