On 3/2/2016 4:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Ok, applied with a bunch of changes ontop.
Thanks!
The second patch is relying on the assumption that a hwid of 0 is invalid. Is that so?
Yes, HWID of 0 is invalid. Thanks, -Aravind.
On 3/2/2016 4:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Ok, applied with a bunch of changes ontop.
Thanks!
The second patch is relying on the assumption that a hwid of 0 is invalid. Is that so?
Yes, HWID of 0 is invalid. Thanks, -Aravind.