On 02/03/16 19:50, Steve Muckle wrote: > On 03/02/2016 06:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I'm not actually sure if RT is the right answer here. DL may be a > > better choice. After all, we want the thing to happen shortly, but > > not necessarily at full speed. > > > > So something like a DL workqueue would be quite useful here it seems. > > The DL idea seems like a good one to me. > > It would also prevent cpufreq changes from being delayed by other RT or > DL tasks. >
Dimensioning period and runtime could require some experimenting, but it's worth a try, I agree. Best, - Juri
