On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:03:14 +0200 Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> wrote:
> This stalled a bit, but the waters are still muddy... I've been dealing with real-world obnoxiousness, something which won't come to an immediate end, unfortunately. But I have been taking some time to mess with things, and hope to have some more POC patches to send out soon. > Is the Sphinx/reStructuredText table support adequate for media/v4l > documentation? That's perhaps the biggest question. My sense is "yes", but this needs a bit more assurance than that. > Are the Sphinx output formats adequate in general? Specifically, is the > lack of DocBook support, and the flexibility it provides, a blocker? DocBook is a means to an end; nobody really wants DocBook itself as far as I can tell. I've been messing with rst2pdf a bit; it's not hard to get reasonable output, and, with some effort, we could probably get really nice output. HTML and EPUB are easily covered, still haven't really played around with man pages yet. And there's LaTeX if we really need it. I kind of think we're covered there, unless I've missed something? > Otherwise, I think Sphinx is promising. > > Jon, I think we need a roll of dice, err, a well-thought-out decision > from the maintainer to go with one or the other, so we can make some > real progress. My inclination at the moment is very much in the Sphinx direction. I had some vague thoughts of pushing a throwaway experimental directory with a couple of docs for 4.6 that would just let people play with it easily; then we'd see how many screams we get. We'll see if the world lets me get there. Thanks, jon
