On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:12:33AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> +void cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int
>> relation)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int freq;
>> +
>> + if (target_freq == policy->cur)
>> + return;
>
> But what if relation is different from last time? ;-)
Doh
Never mind, I'll drop this check (that said this mistake is present
elsewhere too IIRC).
