Hi Ulf, Thank you for the review.
On Friday 04 March 2016 11:22:49 Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 2 March 2016 at 00:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > During runtime resume the return values of the start and restore steps > > are ignored. As a result drivers are not notified of runtime resume > > failures and can't propagate them up. Fix it by returning an error if > > either the start or restore step fails, and clean up properly in the > > error path. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com> > > --- > > > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > This fixes an issue I've noticed with my driver's .runtime_resume() > > handler returning an error that was never propagated out of > > pm_runtime_get_sync(). > > > > A second issue then appeared. The device .runtime_error field is set to > > the error code returned by my .runtime_resume() handler, but it never > > reset. Any subsequent try to resume the device fails with -EINVAL. I'm not > > sure what the right way to solve that is, advices are welcome. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > index 301b785f9f56..8cfcb8d6179b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > @@ -485,8 +485,13 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device > > *dev) > > if (timed && runtime_pm) > > time_start = ktime_get(); > > > > - genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev); > > - genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev); > > + ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev); > > + if (ret) > > + goto err_poweroff; > > + > > + ret = genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev); > > + if (ret) > > + goto err_stop; > > > > /* Update resume latency value if the measured time exceeds it. */ > > if (timed && runtime_pm) { > > @@ -501,6 +506,17 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device > > *dev) > > } > > > > return 0; > > + > > +err_stop: > > + genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev); > > +err_poweroff: > > + if (!dev->power.irq_safe) { > > There's a helper function for this: > pm_runtime_is_irq_safe() > > Perhaps, we can leave this as is here and then make a separate patch > converting all occurrences of the above into using the helper function > instead. If there are other occurrences a separate patch would make sense, I agree. > > + mutex_lock(&genpd->lock); > > + genpd_poweroff(genpd, 0); > > + mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock); > > + } > > + > > + return ret; > > > > } > > > > static bool pd_ignore_unused; > > Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> Thank you. Do you plan to take the patch in your tree for v4.6 ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart