* Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > diff -r 48f31ae5d7b5 arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c Sat Jan 06 10:32:24 2007 +1100 > +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c Sat Jan 06 17:23:12 2007 +1100 > @@ -596,6 +596,154 @@ static int __init print_banner(void) > return 0; > } > core_initcall(print_banner); > + > +unsigned long paravirt_save_flags(void) > +{ > + return paravirt_ops.save_fl(); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_save_flags);
ok, i like this one too - i agree that it's better than mine because it isolates on a per-API level not on a per-lowlevel-paravirt-op level. But this doesnt do the most crutial step: the removal of the paravirt_ops export. Without that the module build test is pointless. btw., your patch does not apply to current -git - could you please rebase this patch to the head of your queue so that upstream can pick it up? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/