On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:37 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote: > > > > There is already a dynamic tick (NO_HZ) system in the -mm tree .. Given > > that this implementation seems unnecessary. Why do you need another > > different system to do this? > > > > We don't. This was written before the dynamic tick code, and now they > need to be merged. Until then, they can safely coexist.
So really this can't go upstream till that merge happens. What's preventing you from just directly using NO_HZ without changes? Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
