The PATA support patch for sata_promise appears, from
code inspection, to break the PATA-only 20619 chip.
The patch removes the SATA flag from the TX2plus SATA+PATA
boards' common flags, with the intention of adding it back
via the _port_flags[] entries for those boards' SATA ports.
However, it unconditionally marks ports 0 and 1 as SATA
for all boards. This causes the 20619 (TX4000) to announce
its first two PATA ports as SATA | ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS.
I don't have a TX4000 so I don't know what the actual
consequences of this bug are, but surely this isn't Ok.
Fixed by moving the port 0 and 1 settings as SATA into
the TX4 and TX2plus specific initialisation code.
Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.20-rc3/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c.~1~ 2007-01-06
17:05:29.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc3/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c 2007-01-06 17:10:56.000000000
+0100
@@ -957,9 +957,6 @@ static int pdc_ata_init_one (struct pci_
probe_ent->port[0].scr_addr = base + 0x400;
probe_ent->port[1].scr_addr = base + 0x500;
- probe_ent->_port_flags[0] = ATA_FLAG_SATA;
- probe_ent->_port_flags[1] = ATA_FLAG_SATA;
-
/* notice 4-port boards */
switch (board_idx) {
case board_40518:
@@ -974,6 +971,8 @@ static int pdc_ata_init_one (struct pci_
probe_ent->port[2].scr_addr = base + 0x600;
probe_ent->port[3].scr_addr = base + 0x700;
+ probe_ent->_port_flags[0] = ATA_FLAG_SATA;
+ probe_ent->_port_flags[1] = ATA_FLAG_SATA;
probe_ent->_port_flags[2] = ATA_FLAG_SATA;
probe_ent->_port_flags[3] = ATA_FLAG_SATA;
break;
@@ -995,6 +994,8 @@ static int pdc_ata_init_one (struct pci_
}
else
probe_ent->n_ports = 2;
+ probe_ent->_port_flags[0] = ATA_FLAG_SATA;
+ probe_ent->_port_flags[1] = ATA_FLAG_SATA;
break;
case board_20619:
probe_ent->n_ports = 4;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
