> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuzn...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 3:00 AM
> To: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; KY
> Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiya...@microsoft.com>; Cathy Avery <cav...@redhat.com>; James E.J.
> Bottomley <jbottom...@odin.com>; Martin K. Petersen"
> <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: fix SRB_STATUS_ABORTED handling
> 
> Commit 3209f9d780d1 ("scsi: storvsc: Fix a bug in the handling of SRB
> status flags") filtered SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID out effectively
> making
> the (SRB_STATUS_ABORTED | SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID) case a dead
> code. The
> logic from this branch (e.g. storvsc_device_scan() call) is still required,
> fix the check.
> 
> Fixes: 3209f9d780d1 ("scsi: storvsc: Fix a bug in the handling of SRB status
> flags")
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>

Thanks Vitaly.

Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> index 292c04e..3ddcabb 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> @@ -914,8 +914,9 @@ static void storvsc_handle_error(struct
> vmscsi_request *vm_srb,
>               do_work = true;
>               process_err_fn = storvsc_remove_lun;
>               break;
> -     case (SRB_STATUS_ABORTED | SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID):
> -             if ((asc == 0x2a) && (ascq == 0x9)) {
> +     case SRB_STATUS_ABORTED:
> +             if (vm_srb->srb_status & SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID
> &&
> +                 (asc == 0x2a) && (ascq == 0x9)) {
>                       do_work = true;
>                       process_err_fn = storvsc_device_scan;
>                       /*
> --
> 2.5.0

Reply via email to