On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Daniel Wagner wrote: > From: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> > > With the introduction of the simple wait API we have two very > similar APIs in the kernel. For example wake_up() and swake_up() > is only one character away. Although the compiler will warn > happily the wrong usage it keeps on going an even links the kernel. > Thomas and Peter would rather like to see early missuses reported > as error early on. > > In a first attempt we tried to wrap all swait and wait calls > into a macro which has an compile time type assertion. The result > was pretty ugly and wasn't able to catch all wrong usages. > woken_wake_function(), autoremove_wake_function() and wake_bit_function() > are assigned as function pointers. Wrapping them with a macro around is > not possible. Prefixing them with '_' was also not a real option > because there some users in the kernel which do use them as well. > All in all this attempt looked to intrusive and too ugly. > > An alternative is to turn the pointer type check into an error which > catches wrong type uses. Obviously not only the swait/wait ones. That > isn't a bad thing either. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
