* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:47:22PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > > > Introduce a mechanism by which parts of the cpufreq subsystem > > ("setpolicy" drivers or the core) can register callbacks to be > > executed from cpufreq_update_util() which is invoked by the > > scheduler's update_load_avg() on CPU utilization changes. > > > > This allows the "setpolicy" drivers to dispense with their timers > > and do all of the computations they need and frequency/voltage > > adjustments in the update_load_avg() code path, among other things. > > > > The update_load_avg() changes were suggested by Peter Zijlstra. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 45 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 4 ++++ > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > kernel/sched/rt.c | 4 ++++ > > kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + > > 6 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > So with the understanding that we'll work on getting rid of > cpufreq_trigger_update(). > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
I'm happy with the latest iteration and with the general direction as well! Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Thanks, Ingo
