Hi,
On 10-03-16 10:34, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:35:27PM -0800, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
This changes the driver to use the devm_ version
of thermal_zone_of_sensor_register and cleans
up the local points and unregister calls.
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Thiele <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
index 4857943..d07dd29 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@
struct sun4i_ts_data {
struct device *dev;
struct input_dev *input;
- struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
void __iomem *base;
unsigned int irq;
bool ignore_fifo_data;
@@ -366,10 +365,7 @@ static int sun4i_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(hwmon))
return PTR_ERR(hwmon);
- ts->tz = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(ts->dev, 0, ts,
- &sun4i_ts_tz_ops);
- if (IS_ERR(ts->tz))
- ts->tz = NULL;
+ devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(ts->dev, 0, ts, &sun4i_ts_tz_ops);
Shouldn't we check the return value? There are a few possibilities for
thermal_zone_of_sensor_register to fail.
Note thee old code also was not checking this, it was simply continuing
without having registered a tz-sensor.
I guess we could log an error in that case, but that should be done in a
seperate follow-up patch.
The current patch looks good to me:
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Regards,
Hans
