mem_cgroup_print_oom_info is always called under oom_lock, so
oom_info_lock is redundant.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index fa7bf354ae32..36db05fa8acb 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1150,12 +1150,9 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(struct mem_cgroup 
*memcg)
  */
 void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
 {
-       /* oom_info_lock ensures that parallel ooms do not interleave */
-       static DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_info_lock);
        struct mem_cgroup *iter;
        unsigned int i;
 
-       mutex_lock(&oom_info_lock);
        rcu_read_lock();
 
        if (p) {
@@ -1199,7 +1196,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, 
struct task_struct *p)
 
                pr_cont("\n");
        }
-       mutex_unlock(&oom_info_lock);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.1.4

Reply via email to