On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com> wrote: >> But you return 0 == false for success and 1 == true for failure. > > Aaargh! -ETOOMUCHSHELLSCRIPTPROGRAMMING > > -Tony
Options to fix this: 1) Just change the comments in the code. This seems like it would confuse people as I thing most people would expect the "true" return to mean the copy succeeded. 2) Reverse the return values. Better that option 1 - but doesn't leave scope to return a count if some future user does want to know where the copy failed. 3) Change the return type back from "bool" to "int" 0 == success, non-zero == fail (with option to put the non-copied byte count in later). 4) Something else -Tony