On Tue 15 Dec 04:30 PST 2015, Georgi Djakov wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c
[..]
> +
> +static struct clk_rpm *apq8064_clks[] = {
> + [QCOM_RPM_PXO_CLK] = &apq8064_pxo,
> + [QCOM_RPM_CXO_CLK] = &apq8064_cxo,
> + [QCOM_RPM_APPS_FABRIC_CLK] = &apq8064_afab_clk,
> + [QCOM_RPM_CFPB_CLK] = &apq8064_cfpb_clk,
> + [QCOM_RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK] = &apq8064_daytona_clk,
> + [QCOM_RPM_EBI1_CLK] = &apq8064_ebi1_clk,
> + [QCOM_RPM_MM_FABRIC_CLK] = &apq8064_mmfab_clk,
> + [QCOM_RPM_MMFPB_CLK] = &apq8064_mmfpb_clk,
> + [QCOM_RPM_SYS_FABRIC_CLK] = &apq8064_sfab_clk,
> + [QCOM_RPM_SFPB_CLK] = &apq8064_sfpb_clk,
> + [QCOM_RPM_QDSS_CLK] = &apq8064_qdss_clk,
> +};
> +
I do believe we did discuss this, but fwiw, do we really want the rpm
resource identifiers here? Rather than something clock specific
(from qcom,rpmcc.h)?
Regards,
Bjorn
