On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:24:38AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:35:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The aio changes have either been reviewed negatively or not at all. That > > tree should be dropped. > > That isn't solely your decision. If you have comments, please provide > constructive feedback, as there are users and use-cases that need this > kind of functionality.
Nothing should be a "sole decision". But you have patches that stomp all over areas outside your maintainership, and even those in there aren't reviewed. This does not fit the Linux-next criteria.
