Hi Thierry,
Can you please apply this patch?
It's completely independent from the rest of the series.
Thanks,
Boris
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:56:24 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Commit 5c31252c4a86 ("pwm: Add the pwm_is_enabled() helper") introduced a
> new function to test whether a PWM device is enabled or not without
> manipulating PWM internal fields.
> Hiding this is necessary if we want to smoothly move to the atomic PWM
> config approach without impacting PWM drivers.
> Fix this driver to use pwm_is_enabled() instead of directly accessing the
> ->flags field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c
> index 6e99a63..70899c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int rcar_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> pwm_device *pwm,
> return div;
>
> /* Let the core driver set pwm->period if disabled and duty_ns == 0 */
> - if (!test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags) && !duty_ns)
> + if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm) && !duty_ns)
> return 0;
>
> rcar_pwm_update(rp, RCAR_PWMCR_SYNC, RCAR_PWMCR_SYNC, RCAR_PWMCR);
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
