Hi Lee, On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Peter Griffin wrote: > > > Most drivers for STi are under the ARM/STI Architecture section which > > includes this mailing list. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.grif...@linaro.org> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 6ee06ea..c541a89 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -3814,6 +3814,7 @@ DRM DRIVERS FOR STI > > M: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaign...@linaro.org> > > M: Vincent Abriou <vincent.abr...@st.com> > > L: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > > +L: ker...@stlinux.com > > T: git http://git.linaro.org/people/benjamin.gaignard/kernel.git > > S: Maintained > > F: drivers/gpu/drm/sti > > Doesn't it make more sense to add drivers/gpu/drm/sti/ to the ARM/STI > ARCHITECTURE list of supported files? I assumed Vincent and Benjamin deliberately added a new entry because they want to be maintainers of this driver (which I think probably makes sense given that the display IP is quite complicated). Not seeing these patches on ker...@stlinux.com list though has caught me out, especially recent changes applied to the firmware loading mechanism in drm/sti which also need similar changes in c8sectpfe and fdma drivers. regards, Peter.
