On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:22:55 -0600 Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + lower_file->f_op->write(lower_file, (char __user *)page_virt, > + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, &lower_file->f_pos); hm. sys_write() takes a local copy of f_pos and writes that back into the struct file. It does this so that two concurrent write() callers don't make a mess of f_pos, and of the file contents. Perhaps ecryptfs should be calling vfs_write()? That way we'd also get the fsnotify notifications, which ecryptfs presently appears to have subverted. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
