On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:35:07AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:11:45 +0100 > Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > > So the problem with preempt_enable_trace() is that we just called a > > _notrace(), and while I now know these are two different trace thingies, > > I might have forgotten that in a few days. > > > > What about preempt_latency_start() for the disable, and > preempt_latency_stop() for the enable? Make it more like a stop watch?
ok that works.
