On 03/17, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: > Add tblck to the pwm nodes. This insures that the ehrpwm driver has access > to the time-based clk. > > Do not remove similar entries for ehrpwm node. Later patches will switch > from using ehrpwm node name to pwm. But to maintain ABI compatibility we > shouldn't remove the old entries. > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <[email protected]> > ---
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> Are there any plans to get off these DT_CLK entries entirely? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
