On Thursday 11 January 2007 01:37, Neil Brown wrote: > On Wednesday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > In looking at the Linux code for ERESTARTNOHAND, I see that > > include/linux/errno.h says this errno should never make it to the user. > > However, in this instance we ARE seeing it. Looking around on google shows > > others are seeing it as well, though hits are few. > .. > > > > Thoughts? > > Just a 'me too' at this point. > The X server on my shiny new notebook (Core 2 Duo) occasionally dies > with 'select' repeatedly returning ERESTARTNOHAND. It is most > annoying!
Normally it should be only visible in strace. Did you see it without strace? > > You don't mention in the Email which kernel version you use but I see > from the web page you reference it is 2.6.19.1. I'm using > 2.6.18.something. > > I thought I'd have a quick look at the code, comparing i386 to x86-64 > and guess what I found..... > > On x86-64, regs->rax is "unsigned long", so the following is > needed.... regs->rax is unsigned long. I don't think your patch will make any difference. What do you think it will change? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/