On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:58:02AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:29:38PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Not sure... I can imagine kgdb, for example, wanting to handle the stepping > itself. You also need to play clever tricks if you want to step through > LL/SC atomics, which the code here doesn't even try to handle (because > it involves disassembling the instructions and applying a bunch of > heuristics), so I imagine most debuggers wanting to take care of the step > themselves.
Fair enough... right, a whole host of tricky this.
