Removing two "!= NULL" from fwserial.c as suggested by checkpatch.pl.
Note that the associated expression "port->port.console" is a 1-bit-field
that is already assumed as an implicit boolean (that is: without comparison)
Signed-off-by: Dominique van den Broeck <domdev...@free.fr>
---
drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c
b/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c
index 66e54e7..4dd5304 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c
@@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ static void fwserial_virt_plug_complete(struct fwtty_peer
*peer,
dma_fifo_change_tx_limit(&port->tx_fifo, port->max_payload);
spin_unlock_bh(&peer->port->lock);
- if (port->port.console && port->fwcon_ops->notify != NULL)
+ if (port->port.console && port->fwcon_ops->notify)
(*port->fwcon_ops->notify)(FWCON_NOTIFY_ATTACH, port->con_data);
fwtty_info(&peer->unit, "peer (guid:%016llx) connected on %s\n",
@@ -1808,7 +1808,7 @@ static void fwserial_release_port(struct fwtty_port
*port, bool reset)
RCU_INIT_POINTER(port->peer, NULL);
spin_unlock_bh(&port->lock);
- if (port->port.console && port->fwcon_ops->notify != NULL)
+ if (port->port.console && port->fwcon_ops->notify)
(*port->fwcon_ops->notify)(FWCON_NOTIFY_DETACH, port->con_data);
}
--
2.4.3
