On 30-03-16, 03:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -843,6 +883,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct
> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
>
> if (data) {
> + policy->fast_switch_possible = false;Is this done just for keeping code symmetric or is there a logical advantage of this? Just for my understanding, not saying that it is wrong. Otherwise, it looks good Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- viresh
