Hi Andres,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:19:26PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-03-30 10:46:34 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:34:18PM +0200, Andres Freund escreveu:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 4b3a3212233a - "perf hists browser: Support flat callchains" seems to
> > > have broken callchain display in tui mode when using !flat mode, or at
> > > least changed it in an unintended manner.
> >
> > humm, at first I thought this would be related to --percent-limit...
>
> I'm not using --percent-limit. Just to be sure, I did explicitly set it
> to various values, and it looks unrelated.
>
> > What tree/branch are you using? Can you try pressing 'L' to play with
> > the percent limit?
>
> I'm primarily using linus' tree, and bisected the behavioural down to
> that individual commit.
Thanks for reporting and finding this!
>
> It's somewhat weird that --stdio doesn't show the problem, but --tui
> does. Hm.
>
>
> I don't know the perf code at all, but skimming through the commit, the
> following hunk looks suspicious:
>
> @@ -263,7 +295,7 @@ static void callchain_node__init_have_children(struct
> callchain_node *node,
> chain = list_entry(node->val.next, struct callchain_list, list);
> chain->has_children = has_sibling;
>
> - if (!list_empty(&node->val)) {
> + if (node->val.next != node->val.prev) {
> chain = list_entry(node->val.prev, struct callchain_list, list);
> chain->has_children = !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&node->rb_root);
> }
>
> Reverting that individual change fixes things. I'm not actually sure
> what the post 4b3a3212233a version actually tests for?
Yeah, this is it. It's my fault that I thought if the first chain
(node->val.next) was set by has_sibling, no need to go to the body
of the "if" statement when next == prev case. But it's not...
>
>
> I think that actually explains why stdio works - nodes are always
> unfolded in it, thus ->has_children isn't looked at.
Right, the ->has_children thing is only for TUI code which
folds/collapses the entries dynamically.
Do you mind resending the fix as a formal patch with my ack ?
Thanks,
Namhyung
