Hi! > > >> > It didn't. It looks like it is unusable, becuase it isn't reliable in > > >> > 2.6.20-rc3. > > >> > > >> Is this issue still present in -rc4? > > > > > >I used 2.6.20-rc4 in single user mode, and applied 2 patches from > > >netdev to get wake on LAN support. This way I was able to set up an > > >automatic suspend/resume loop. It looked good, but after e.g. 20 > > >minutes, the resume hang. So it is reproduceable with 2.6.20-rc4. > > >Unfortunately, I can not test the same with 2.6.18, as the wake on LAN > > >patches need 2.6.20-rc. > > > > Hmm, do you mean this is the first time of this kind of testing? > > Is this issue related to LAN driver? > > I guess you should be able to set up an automatic suspend/resume loop > > with /proc/acpi/alarm, and test similar with 2.6.18. > > Thanks for the hint. I just used /proc/acpi/alarm to set up a > suspend/resume loop and did ca. 100 cycles in a row with 2.6.18.2 in > single user mode, without a failure.
Can you do similar test on 2.6.20 -- w/o network driver loaded (and generaly minimum drivers?) Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/