> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016, 5:12 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org> >> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Pandruvada, Srinivas >> >>> <srinivas.pandruv...@intel.com> wrote: >> >>>> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 15:46 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> >>>>> On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 00:25 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > On 3/31/2016 12:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 23:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > Hi, >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > (snipped) >> >> But it is not clear to us whether or not your system has regressed >> with respect to 4.5, which is the whole point of this thread. Do you >> see a regression here? >> >> Jörg in particular is saying that he sees the problem with both >> performance and powersave settings. What about you?
Resend. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114741 I was looking through ubsan and found this relevant.Hp envy runs on x64 but the bug seems to mention (ia64). I see two versions rdmsrl and rdmsrl_safe. These values are filled by rdmsrl .Does changing to safe function help . Can an exception ever happen in case of MSR_IA32_APERF ? Those values certainly cannot be negative and so huge.
