On 2016/4/1 17:25, Shannon Zhao wrote: > If it really needs is_xen_node(), I will not factor > fdt_find_hyper_node() in patch 11 since it uses flat DT while here it's > going to use unflatten DT. Sorry, I'm wrong. They both use flat DT. But it's no need to factor fdt_find_hyper_node() since is_xen_node is very simple like below I think.
of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "xen,xen"); And maybe it cloud directly use above check in dt_scan_depth1_nodes. Thanks, -- Shannon
