On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
> I also tried a bad wrmsrl at a couple early points. Very very early
> it just works with not warning. A little later and it prints the
> warning.
Ok, that sounds like the correct behavior - I'm sure the very very
early ones "warned" too, it just got dropped on the floor due to being
before the printing/logging was up and running.
And even then, it's obviously much better than having machines
mysteriously just reboot.
Thanks,
Linus
