On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:14:45PM +0800, zengzhao...@163.com wrote:
> From: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.z...@gmail.com>
> 
> Use alternatives, lifted from arch_hweight
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.z...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/arch_hweight.h |   5 ++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/arch_parity.h  | 102 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h       |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/lib/Makefile               |   8 +++
>  arch/x86/lib/parity.c               |  32 ++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch_parity.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/parity.c

...

> +static __always_inline unsigned int __arch_parity32(unsigned int w)
> +{
> +     unsigned int res;
> +
> +     asm(ALTERNATIVE("call __sw_parity32", POPCNT32 "; and $1, %0", 
> X86_FEATURE_POPCNT)
> +             : "="REG_OUT (res)
> +             : REG_IN (w)
> +             : "cc");

So why all that churn instead of simply doing:

static __always_inline unsigned int __arch_parity32(unsigned int w)
{
        return hweight32(w) & 1;
}

Ditto for the 64-bit version.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 
(AG Nürnberg)
-- 

Reply via email to