On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 02:27:35PM -0700, Tim Riker wrote: > #pragma is a particularly difficult problem to deal with because it is > non macro friendly. =( > > Sounds like C99 initializers are a likely first target for integration. > > I'll keep plugging away at other stuff here as well. I've been coding C for some years ... But I don't know too much these features (even don't know about named initializers found in this list some weeks ago, I don't know only the name of this thing ? ;-) So where can I read about these ? Thanx, Gabor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Martin Dalecki
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Gábor Lénárt
- Re: non-gcc linux? Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Jes Sorensen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... David Lang
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andrea Arcangeli