On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Linus Torvalds > <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> >> So I'd find a patch like the attached to be perfectly acceptable (in >> fact, we should have done this long ago). > > I just committed it, let's see if some odd program uses the iomem > data. I doubt it, and I always enjoy improvements that remove more > lines of code than they add.
Hrm, okay. I still think just changing the perms would be less troublesome. Knowing where the kernel is in physical memory when debugging physical memory issues seems important to me. But, I have never actually used it since I prefer looking in kallsyms. :) -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
