These identifiers are bogus. The interested architectures should define
HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS whenever relevant to do so. If this
isn't true for some arch, it should be fixed in the arch definition.
Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvate...@gmail.com>
---
lib/lz4/lz4defs.h | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h
index 0710a62..c79d7ea 100644
--- a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h
+++ b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h
@@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S;
typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S;
typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) \
- || defined(CONFIG_ARM) && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 \
- && defined(ARM_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
#define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v)
#define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v)
--
2.7.4
