> It seems like both IBM's JFS and ext3 wants to use fs/jfs .. IMHO that > is like asking for problem.. A more logic location for ext3 should be > fs/ext3, no? fs/jfs is the general purpose journalling layer. Of course while thats very sensible it does clash with the ibm jfs. Maybe fs/journalling is needed ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Michael Boman
- Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Alan Cox
- Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Andreas Dilger
- Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... James Sutherland
- Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations... Stephen C. Tweedie